* Theory * Part III. Playscript * Am Drama * * amazon.com *
Williams: Humanity is just a work in progress.
[ advertising space : webmaster ] text LINKS Memory and Dramatic Form in Death of a Salesman Peter Szondi: Arthur Miller's evolution from imitator to innovator, which occurred between the publication of his first two works, is the clearest example of that general change in style that both unites and separates the turn-of the-century dramatists and those of the present: the emergence out of dramatic form of a new formal structure for those epic elements that had previously only been given thematic expression. If this process, which is central to the developmental history of the modern theater, has, up to this point, been presented mainly in terms of comparison between the two periods, by contrasting Ibsen and Pirandello, Chekhov and Wilder, Hauptmann and Brecht, in Miller's case, as with Strindberg's earlier, it can be illuminated by the works of a single author.
Death of A Salesman; Links & Resources (from Australia onLine)! Sister-Pages: American Drama, Part One O'Neill Also, T. Williams THR 215 Images: Periods & Styles [ taken out ] VIRTUAL THEATRE Subtitle: "Certain Private Conversations in Two Acts and A Requiem" Willy Loman -- "low man"? Willy, not Bill. Wife -- Linda! Sons: Biff & Happy ..."Before us is the Salesman's house."
American Dream and American Tragedy, or American Dream = American Tragedy? "... We're free and clear. We're free. We're free... We're free..." Money, work and freedom for self-slavery American Christ Death of a Salesman: Tragic Myth in the Modern Theatre -- Perhaps the dominant theme in the drama of the twentieth century is an attempt to recover" or, more precisely, to restate" a tragic apprehension about the human condition. A pervasive concern about the ultimate meaning of human suffering is reflected, in one way or another, in the work of all of the major playwrights of the twentieth century: in that of Ibsen, Strindberg, Chekhov, Shaw, Claudel, Synge, Lorca, and O'Neill, as well as in that of Pirandello, Brecht, Sartre, Camus, and more recently, Wilder, Williams, Beckett, Genet, Albee, and others. [ in Bloom ] 2002: I do not know how much from the 20th century we can cover in DramLit; Pirandello, Lorca (should I drop O'Neil this time?), Brecht (Mother Courage), Williams (The Glass Managerie), Miller, Beckett, Shepard (Buried Child), Pinter (Betrayal), Mamet (Oleanna) [Kushner in THR413]. The Bedford Drama (too much already). What about Fornes (Conduct of Life) and August Wilson? What is American drama? Related pages: AmDrama, Am Century and "individual playwright" pages (Albee, Williams and etc.)
View from the Future: 2004 -- Bergman & Kurosawa (main stage)
|
theatre |
Read about national theatre idea, read pages on O'Neill and . "American Age" or "American Century" -- postmodern "nation" USA.From Pirandello and Brecht to 3 American playwrights. Back to Chekhov (Realism) and to the Postmodern (Absurd, Beckett).
Playwright Arthur Miller: born - October 17, 1915 in New York.* O'Neill -- Willams -- Muller: "the big three"
Many of his plays are based (slightly) on his own life, like his marriage to Marilyn Monroe :}
His first successes in writing, and of his awards like the Drama Critics Circle Awards. Bio Info
What's the matter with you? I don't know. Every time I come to this small story about one little man and his life I have a sense of tragedy. Maybe because it's close to home -- America.
Maybe because this is the best life can offer you. Best ever. And that is what you get.From O'Neill to Miller's Tragedy and The Common Man -- "In this age few tragedies are written..." (p. 683)
"It's not easy to find people who use the language the way I think it is in my plays. They tend to emotionalize everything when, in fact, the emotion can come through the language with far less effort than they're putting into it. I made it easy for them, really, if they'll just trust the language."
Death of a Salesman > Glengarry Glen Ross (1992), Mamet (American Century, American Drama, American Tragedy): Won the Pulitzer prize in Drama for "Glengary Glen Ross". His stage work assayed in book entitled, "How Good is David Mamet, Anyway?" by critic John Heilpern, Dec.1999. script.vtheatre.net/themes pages!
Death of A Salesman (1949)
"...I believe that the common man is as apt a subject for tragedy in its highest sense as kings were." Arthur MillerIt makes the whole thing even more tragic.
* "Take Two": Albee -- Mamet -- Shepard (or Kushner?)
... and finaly, Pomo (Also, Beckett), Pata-Theatre and etc. The End of DramLit territory and the entrance into Playscript Analysis class! See you there! (next offering -- Fall 1999)
Not for the 215 (DramLit) class: Albee "Who is Afraid of Virginia Woolf?" (my paper for the Albee Conference in 1997). [Not posted yet]
For Playscript Analysis class: Shepard. Kushner is on another page. Pinter has no page.
My "Director's Notes" on The Island: Fugard
"American Drama" should be called North American Drama and here comes in the theme of the North. Ibsen, Strindberg and Chekhov.THR413 Writing assignments: 200 words post after reading each play (plus, oral presentation). Midterm Paper (Outline, 1st Draft, Final), Final (and/or the Scene -- the same three stages or rewrites), tests.
... The absence of conventional patterns of mythic interpretation has made it necessary for the American dramatist to devise new ways of seeing, interpreting, and re-creating reality. In terms of his ability to formulate coherent mythic patterns, perhaps the most effective dramatist in the American group is the "middle" playwright Arthur Miller.In his major works, All My Sons, Death of a Salesman, The Crucible, and A View from the Bridge, Miller seems to demonstrate a superiority to other American dramatists in the symbolic interpretation of universal dimensions of collective experience. Indeed, perhaps the most nearly mature myth about human suffering in an industrial age is Miller's masterwork, Death of a Salesman. In this work, first performed some thirteen years ago, Miller has formulated a statement about the nature of human crises in the twentieth century which seems, increasingly, to be applicable to the entire fabric of civilized experience. The superiority of Death of a Salesman over the other worthy American dramas such as Mourning Becomes Electra, A Streetcar Named Desire, or Miller's own work, The Crucible, is the sensitivity of its myth: the critical relationship of its central symbol, the Salesman, to the interpretation of the whole of contemporary life. In this image, Miller brings into the theatre a figure who is, in our age, a kind of hero¡ªa ritual representative of an industrial society. It is its intimate association with our aspirations which gives to the story of Loman an ambiguous, but highly affecting, substratum of religious, philosophical, political, and social meanings. The appearance of the Salesman Loman as the subject of moral exploration stirs the modern spectator at that alternately joyful and painful periphery of consciousness which is the province of tragedy. The enactment of his suffering, fall, and partial enlightenment, provokes a mixed response: that anger and delight, indignation and sympathy, pity and fear, which Aristotle described as "catharsis."
Miller writes that, in Loman, he has attempted to personify certain values which civilized men, in the twentieth century, share. The movement of tragedy from the ground of the lawless Titan Prometheus to that of the common man Loman does not represent, for Miller, a decline in values; on the contrary, it is evidence of a hopeful development. For Loman, a descendant of the nineteenth-century protagonists of Ibsen, Chekhov, Shaw, and others, reflects Western civilization's increasing concern with a democratic interpretation of moral responsibilities. Death of a Salesman attempts to explore the implications of a life for which men, not gods, are wholly responsible.
Some of the problems with the interpretation of this play have grown out of the author's own statements about his intent; that is to say, Miller seems to have created in Death of a Salesman a new form which transcended his conscious motive. Death of a Salesman, despite the presence of those social implications which Miller notes in his later essays, is a myth, not a document; that is to say, it is not, in the conventional sense, a problem play. Unlike Miller's earlier work, All My Sons, Death of a Salesman is not concerned with such human failings as may find permanent social, political, or even psychological remedy. Death of a Salesman, like The Crucible and A View from the Bridge, is, rather, a study of a man's existence in a metaphysical universe. It is, like Agamemnon, Oedipus the King, Hamlet, and King Lear, a mythic apprehension of life. Willy Loman, like the traditional tragic protagonist, symbolizes the cruel paradox of human existence. His story [according to Miller's introduction to Collected Plays,] stripped to its mythic essentials, is familiar:
An aged king,a pious man, moves toward life's end. Instead of reaping the benefits of his piety, he finds himself caught in bewildering circumstances. Because of a mistake, an error in judgment¡ªa tragic reversal has taken place in his life. Where he has been priest, knower of secrets, wielder of power, and symbol of life, he now finds himself adjudged defiler, usurper, destroyer, and necessary sacrifice. Like the traditional hero, Loman begins his long season of agony. In his descent, however, there is the familiar tragic paradox; for as he moves toward inevitable destruction, he acquires that knowledge, that sense of reconciliation, which allows him to conceive a redemptive plan for his house.As in traditional tragedy, Loman, the ritual head of his house, seeks to discover a design in the paradoxical movement of life; to impose upon it a sense of meaning greater than that conferred upon it by actuality. The play asks the ancient questions: What real value is there in life? What evil resides in seeming good? What good is hidden in seeming evil? What permanence is buried beneath the face of change? What use can man make of his suffering?
Miller describes this drama as a study of circumstances which affect human destiny in the moral universe:
I take it that if one could know enough about a human being one could discover some conflict, some value, some challenge, however minor or major, which he cannot find it in himself to walk away from or turn his back on. The structure of these plays, in this respect, is to the end that such a conflict be discovered and clarified. Idea, in these plays, is the generalized meaning of that discovery applied to men other than the hero. Time, characterizations, and other elements are treated differently from play to play, but all to the end that that moment of commitment be brought forth, that moment when, in my eyes, a man differentiates himself from every other man, that moment when out of a sky full of stars he fixes on one star. I take it, as well, that the less capable a man is of walking away from the central conflict of the play, the closer he approaches a tragic existence. In turn, this implies that the closer a man approaches tragedy the more intense is his concentration of emotion upon the fixed point of his commitment.... The assumption, or presumption, behind these plays is that life has meaning.(Introduction, Collected Plays)
[ Arthur Miller's Death of a Salesman by Harold Bloom; Chelsea House, 1988, Death of a Salesman: Tragic Myth in the Modern Theatre -- Esther Merle Jackson p.8 ]
A few words about "Beyond Theraphy" by Christ Durang: second times acting/directing students do it as a class project (finals). Comedy, replaced Endgame (too advanced for Intermediate Acting and Fundamentals of Directing). ...Later.
2007 DramLit class -- groups.yahoo.com/group/dramlit
Film-North * Anatoly Antohin * eCitations
© 2005 by vtheatre.net. Permission to link to this site is granted. books.google.com + scholar.google.com
cite: anatoly antohin. URL + date [ my shows : 1. writer * 2. director * 3. dramaturg * 4. actor ]