2008-2009 -- STAGEMATRIX.COM
Italian Futurist Theatre, 1909-1944 by Günter Handler Berghaus; Clarendon Press, 1998 - Part I: Introduction - 1: Futurist Theatre: `A Preliminary Characterization - Notes - 2: The State of Italian Theatre Before the Advent of Futurism - Notes - 3: Marinetti's Early Writings and Aesthetics: a Prelude to Futurism - Notes - 4: The Founding of the Futurist Movement and the First Manifestos - Notes - Part II: The Birth of a Futurist Theatre - 1: Political Action Theatre as a Performative Genre - Notes - 2: The Beginnings of a Futurist Performance Art: the Early Serate - Notes - 3: Futurist Dramatic Theory: the Early Manifestos - Notes - 4: Futurism and the Professional Theatre: the First Companies Touring with a Futurist Repertoire - Notes - 5: Theatre Performances in Art Galleries - Notes - 6: The Stage Works of Giacomo Balla - Notes - 7: Enrico Prampolini's Early Futurist Career - Notes - 8: Fortunato Depero's Theatrical Experiments of the 1910s - Notes - Part III: The Second Futurist Movement, 1920-1930 - 1: Futurism Under the Fascist RÉgime - Notes - 2: The Revival of Futurist Theatre in the 1920s - Notes - 3: Futurist Cabarets, Artists' Festivals, and Banquets - Notes - 4: From the Religion of Speed to the Cult of the Machine - Notes - 5: The Machine Art of Vinicio Paladini and Ivo Pannaggi - Notes - 6: Fillia's Theatrical Experiments of the 1920s - Notes - 7: Enrico Prampolini's Theatrical Career in the 1920s - Notes - 8: Fortunato Depero's Contribution to a Futurist Mechanical Theatre - Notes - 9: Fedele Azari and Futurist Aerial Theatre - Notes - 10: Vasari's Apocalyptic Vision of the Futurist Machine Age - Notes - Part IV: Epilogue: Futurism in the 1930s and 1940s - 1: Futurism Tied to the Procrustean Bed of the Fascist State - Notes - 2: The Last Signs of Life in Futurist Theatre [ script.vtheatre.net/dada ]
![]() ... caligari.txt : sum : notes : main : files : webshow : stagematrix.com | 2009 : vtheatre.net/2009 & filmplus.org/2009
|
![]()
new Spring 2002 THR221 Intermediate Acting (focus on biomechanics) * Comedy & Biomechanics Forum *
THR221 Intermediate Acting
![]() GeoAlaska: Theatre & Film ![]() ![]() biomechanics.vtheatre.net Spring 2003: Don Juan ![]() film books ![]() virtual theatre ![]() ShowCases: 3 Sisters, Mikado, 12th Night, Hamlet, The Importance of Being Earnest, Dangerous Liaisons, Don Juan ![]() ![]() Organization of the book : SYNOPSIS Dada in Script Analysis DADA (1915-1920): Dada is the offspring of a specific world view which is hostile to bourgeois society and the principle of art for art's sake. Dada is opposed to ART.
"Cabaret Voltaire" one rented room in an inn * club house * artistic cabaret * nightly performances * included exhibition of avant-garde art work: Picasso, Marinetti, Arp.
[ pix ]
![]() One Act Fest ![]() ^ The Shrew Film Directing "showcase" ^ NotesDada Theatre Overview *![]() 2004 & After
Dada = in French, a child's word for Horse. Was decided to be the perfect term to mean nothing and yet everything. Because of Dada, Everything, Anything, Everywhere, Anywhere, is Art. ~ The Founder : Tristan Tzara * Wrote Dada Manifesto (mission statement). Flourished chiefly in France, Switzerland, and Germany from about 1916 to 1920. Produced the last play in Dadaism. The Gas Heart Contained characters like Mouth, Nose, Eyes, Ears, etc. Theatre and Art Respond to this Craziness. ~ The Core of Dada : ~ Dadaism was based upon the principles of deliberate irrationality, anarchy, and cynicism.
Theatre and Art Respond to this Craziness. - Before Dada art was in Form. After Dada Art is Attitude. ~ Dadaism had Three Goals :
~ A World Gone Mad :
Surrealism : ~ Andre Brenton wrote the Manifesto of Surrealism.
The Theatre of Cruelty : Artaud - Actor, director, and cult figure.
Related (Daniil Kharms):
The Oberiu Theatre (1928)
Suppose two people walk out on the stage, say nothing, but tell each other something by signs. While they are doing that, they are solemnly puffing out their cheeks. The spectators laugh. Is this theatre? Yes, it is. You may say it is balagan.[1] But balagan is theatre.
Or suppose a canvas is let down on the stage. On the canvas is a picture of a village. The stage is dark. Then it begins to get lighter. A man dressed as a shepherd walks onstage and plays on a pipe. Is that theatre? Yes.
A chair appears on the stage; on the chair is a samovar. The samovar boils. Instead of steam, naked arms rise up from under the lid.
All these—the man and his movements on the stage, the boiling samovar, the village painted on the canvas, the light getting dimmer and getting brighter—all these are separate elements of theatre.
Until now, all these elements have been subordinated to the dramatic plot—to the play. A play has been a story, told through characters, about some kind of event. On the stage, all have worked to explain the meaning and course of that event more clearly, more intelligibly, and to relate it more closely to life.
That is not at all what the theatre is. If an actor who represents a minister begins to move around on the stage on all fours and howls like a wolf, or an actor who represents a Russian peasant suddenly delivers a long speech in Latin—that will be theatre, that will interest the spectator, even if it takes place without any relation to a dramatic plot. Such an action will be a separate item; a series of such items organised by the director will make up a theatrical performance, which will have its plot line and its scenic meaning.
This will be a plot which only the theatre can give. The plots of theatrical performances are theatrical, just as the plots of musical works are musical. All represent one thing—a world of appearances—but depending on the material, they render it differently, after their own fashion.
When you come to us, forget everything that you have been accustomed to seeing in all theatres. Maybe a great deal will seem ridiculous. We take a dramatic plot. We develop it slowly at first; then suddenly it is interrupted by seemingly extraneous and clearly ridiculous elements. You are surprised. You want to find that customary logical sequence of connections which, it seems to you, you see in life. But it is not there. Why not? Because an object and a phenomenon transported from life to the stage lose their lifelike sequence of connections and acquire another—a theatrical one. We are not going to explain it. In order to understand the sequence of connections of any theatrical performance one must see it. We can only say that our task is to render the world of concrete objects on the stage in their interrelationships and collisions. We worked to solve this task in our production of “Elizabeth Bam.”
“Elizabeth Bam” was written on commission for the theatrical section of Oberiu by one of the members, D. Kharms. The dramatic plot of the play is shattered by many seemingly extraneous subjects which detach the object as a separate whole, existing outside its connection with others. Therefore the dramatic plot does not arise before the spectator as a clear plot image; it glimmers, so to speak, behind the back of the action. The dramatic plot is replaced by a scenic plot which arises spontaneously from all the elements of our spectacle. The centre of our attention is on it. But at the same time, separate elements of the spectacle are equally valuable and important to us. They live their separate lives without subordinating themselves to the ticking of the theatrical metronome. Here a corner of a gold frame sticks out—it lives as an object of art; there a fragment of a poem is recited—it is autonomous in its significance, and at the same time, independent of its will, it advances the scenic plot of the play. The scenery, the movement of an actor, a bottle thrown down, the train of a costume—they are actors, just like those who shake their heads and speak various words and phrases.
The Oberiu Group, or Association for Real Art, was rescued from oblivion for English-language readers by George Gibian in 1971, with the publication of a selection of the surviving work of Daniil Kharms (1905-42), and Alexander Vvedensky (1904-41), much of which they had never been able to have published. The Oberiu group to which they belonged was formed in Leningrad in 1926, its best known member the poet Nikolay Zabolotsky. Broadly futurist in tendency, though critical of zaum, the ‘transrational’ language explored by futurist poets (a splintered and reinvented language of emotive speech sounds), the Oberiu put on various readings and performances, wishing to be active in theatre and film as well as poetry and fiction. Its production of Kharms’ play Elizabeth Bam in 1928, however, together with the publication of its manifesto (whose section on theatre was apparently written by Kharms), incurred the disapproval of the authorities, and their programme of performances did not survive past 1930. Kharms and Vvedensky were both arrested in 1941; Vvedensky was shot, in obscure circumstances, soon after; Kharms died of starvation in the Leningrad blockade.
Next - Absurdism
Script Analysis Actor:
Theatre Books Master Page *
...
|
Extreme Comedy, not just physical, but psychological!
"Playing Opposites" (5 Approaches to Acting, Kaplan, Part II).
Anti-Method Approach?
Must be introduced in Acting One "BioMethod" (act.vtheatre.net)
Exerc. in class.
(Texts from Dada Performance PAJ Publications, NY 1987 Ed. Mel Gorden)![]()
See script.vtheatre.net (there is a link to Dada online texts) -- read the scene below, decide what you want to work on (genre, characters, situation): never work on several tasks at the same time! What does constitute "comedy" in this scene? Situation comedy, comedy or characters? Both? What is the conflict? Use your actor's journal at home for analysis. [If you do it right, understanding, acting, staging something like Durang's comedis would be easy.]
Simplify the composition: where do we start? Crying? -- we are to have happy end! For for contrast: rehearse the first and the last lines, untill they become opposite in mood. Where is the climax in the scene (the point of change -- mark it!) Now go back to the individual characters: simple again. Wife? Type and achitype! Theame with the husband. Extreme (BM calls it grotesque -- big, bold chices). Do your line-by-line analysis! Yes, yes, there is a logic in it! There is more need for analysis in Beckett than in Simon!
[ class exerc. in biomechanics.vtheatre.net ] ![]()
"Dada kicks you in the behind and you like it!" Berlin Dadaist slogan (qtd. Goldberg, 69) timeline *ARNALDO CORRADINI [GINNA] and BRUNO CORRA
Alternation of Character / Alternazione di Carattere
[ Dada & Futurism ]HUSBAND: No. It is useless. It is time to finish it! I shall not deceive myself any longer because I make you cry immediately!WIFE (crying): No! Carlo no!... come here... come here . . listen to me!...
HUSBAND (crying tenderly): Pardon me, Rosetta! Pardon me!
WIFE (enraged): For God's sake! If you don't stop with this inopportune sentimentality, I will slap you...
HUSBAND (at the height of his fury): Enough! ... or I shall hurl you out of the window...
WIFE: Darling! Darling! How much I love you! Tenderness grips my heart... give me again your delicious reprimands.
HUSBAND: Ah! Rosetta... Rosetta!... my infinite love...
WIFE (exasperated): If you repeat that another time, I will divorce you!... (Precisely.) I will divorce you!..
HUSBAND (exploding): Ah! Ah! Wretch! ... go away! ... go away! ... go away!...
WIFE: I have never loved you more sweetly!
HUSBAND: Ah! Rosetta! Rosetta! ...
WIFE: Enough ... (She slaps him.)
HUSBAND: Enough, I say. (Slaps her twice.)
WIFE (languidly): Give me your lips! Give me your lips...
HUSBAND: Here, treasure!
CURTAIN
Fish in the Tree class project.
* web & classes online : acting (Method) @ Theatre w/Anatoly & Film-North
Virtual Theatre, Anatoly Antohin
[ recommended: Futurist Performance, Michael and Victoria Kirby, PAJ Pub. NY 1986 ]
"Dada," a name picked at random out of a dictionary, was about the removal of logic and sense from the performance world. It's focus was to create a lack of focus - in art, society and life. Many of the major proponents of Dada refused to refer to it as a "movement" or a school stating that one should not turn a whim into a movement. Initially inspired by Futurism, Hugo Ball and Emmy Hennings developed a cabaret style assault on the bourgeoisie.
projects: BM software texts: webpages: new BM directory for Spring 2004! ![]() Actingland.com - Acting resources, career guides, and casting information. ![]()
|
TRISTAN TZARA: Dada is our intensity; it fixes bayonets without consequence the German baby’s Sumatran head; Dada is art without slippers or parallel; it is against and for unity and decidedly against the future; we know wisely enough that our brains will turn into comfortable cushions that our anti-dogmatism is as narrow as a petty official that we are not free and that we shout freedom. Severe necessity without discipline or morals and spit on humanity. Dada remains within the European frame of weaknesses, it’s shit all the same, but to decorate the zoo-garden of art from now on we want to shit in various colours, of all the flags on the consulates clo clo bong heeho aho heeho aho We are circus managers and whistle in the winds of fairs, among convents prostitutions theatres realities feelings restaurants Hohohohihihioho Bang Bang. We declare that the motor car is a sentiment that has molly-coddled us enough with its dragging abstractions, and transatlantic liners and noises and ideas. However we externalise the facile we seek the central essence and we’re glad we can hide it; we don’t want to count the windows of the marvellous elite because Dada exists for no-one, and we want everyone to understand that is Dada’s balcony, believe me—from which you can hear military machines and whizz down through the air like a seraph into the sea of people to take a piss and understand the parable or the parabola Dada isn’t madness—nor wisdom—nor irony look at me, dear bourgeois.
Art was a game…art isn’t serious, I assure you, and if we show the South in order to say learnedly: negro art without humanity it’s to give you pleasure, good listeners, I love you so, I love you so, I assure you I adore you ...
Speech from The First Celestial Adventure of Mr Antipyrine (1916) [ Twentieth-Century Theatre: A Sourcebook by Richard Drain; Routledge, 1995 ] Tristan Tzara (1896-1963), Romanian writer, moved to Zurich in 1915; a year later, barely 20, he and a group of friends founded Dada. His play, The First Celestial Adventure of Mr Antipyrine, was the first work to be printed under Dada’s aegis. Antipyrine: a drug against fever, which Tzara then happened to be taking. Meanwhile Europe’s fever was the war. Tzara recalled: ‘by 1916-17, the war seemed to have installed itself for good. …All the forms of civilisation that are called modern, and even its basis, logic and reason, aroused disgust’ (radio interview, May 1950). The revolt against logic and language are obvious in the speech-cum-manifesto above. The mention of the South and of negro art reflects Tzara’s enthusiasm for the arts of Africa and Polynesia (as distinct from ‘the forms of civilisation that are called modern’). He used their musical rhythms in his writing. It is unlikely that any slur was intended by his phrase ‘without humanity’. Rather the reverse: humanity at the time was demonstrating its values by slaughtering itself on battlefields. Tzara’s play was staged in full when he moved to Paris in 1920, along with its sequel. Handkerchief of Clouds was written a year after he had pronounced in an article The End of Dada’, and was accounted by Aragon ‘the most remarkable dramatic image of modern art’ (Les Collages, 1965). After Dada, Tzara took the short step onwards to surrealism.
Structuralism and BM in Theatre Theory directory.
Read the pages of THR Theory directory.
[more scenes from "Fish in the Tree" production]
An online course supplement *
2005-2006 Theatre UAF Season: Four Farces + One Funeral & Godot'06
Film-North * Anatoly Antohin * eCitations *
Acting amazon