* 2007-2009 aantohin Film-North * strawberries : 2007 *

2008 class : mise-en-scene vs. montage in W. Straberries
Total Directing
Total Acting
2009 cine101 [LUL]


... filmplus.org/bergman

total acting
film books
classes dir
total directing
virtual theatre

This is a Flickr badge showing photos in a set called film. Make your own badge here.

Latest (last?) updates : Oct. 2008 -- this is my oldest (first) FIRST and left as is...


TOPICS: drama + comedy + postmodern + time + space + death + self + imdb + history + scripts + amazon.com/kindle
Bergman: Film as dream, film as music. No art passes our conscience in the way film does, and goes directly to our feelings, deep down into the dark rooms of our souls.

Bergman Pages 2007 :

* video clips [ First Dream from Wilde Strawberries ]

* biblio [ in one place ]

Sorry, film folks; I have to use my film pages for some theatre classes. This one -- for the Script Analysis, Existentialism (pix below)...

UAF Film


I hadn't touch this page in two years -- and, of course, many links are dead. I do not teach "Film & Movies" in two years. No time for "Film-North" idea... 2002
The Class --

" Thank you, The Academy..." [The Platonic Girls are in Theatre Theory Directory]:

: Objective Idealism

Plato Symbol of Cave

Platonism: Subjective Idealism
"Ideal and Real"
Hegel: Objective Idealism
"Personal Metaphysics"

Reality is...?


America and Movies


Neitzsche and some more antisocials (20th century, Foucault & Co.) are missing... [ not hyperlinked yet ]

new: chekhov.us * Russian Theatre (links in RU): fest.theatre.ru + cultu.ru (webcast) Subscribe to film-north summaries * filmplus.org/kino * picasaweb.google.com/anatoly.antohin * my shared page google * diggo [ new ] & 2010 AA Ethiopia


[ see other "showcase pages" -- Tarkovsky, Kurosawa, Fellini @ film.vtheatre.net ]


The Seventh Seal:

Death: "What are you waiting for?"
Knight: "Knowledge."
Death: "You want a guarantee."
Knight: "Call it what you will. . . . What will become of us, who want to believe but cannot? And what of those, who neither will nor can believe? . . I want knowledge. Not belief. Not surmise. But knowledge. I want God to put out His hand, show His face, speak to me."

Teaching, Writing, Film -- directing + theory, Webbing, 2006

Content copyright protected by Copyscape website plagiarism search

Bergman greatly admired the work of the Russian director Andrei Tarkovsky and said that Tarkovsky was able to enter and move freely in rooms, which remained inaccesible to him (Bergman). The reason for this is simple: Tarkovsky never abandoned his quest for a connection with God, and greatness for any artist (as well as any human being) is determined solely on the basis of this quest.


BERGMAN SPEAKS... "Isak Borg equals me. IB equals Ice and Borg (the Swedish word for fortress). Simple and facile. I had created a figure who, on the outside, looked like my father but was me, through and through. I was then thirty-seven, cut off from all human relations. It was I who had done the cutting off, presumably an act of self-affirmation. I was a loner, a failure, I mean a complete failure. Though successful. And clever. And orderly. And disciplined.
I was looking for my father and my mother, but I could not find them. In the final scene of Wild Strawberries there is a strong element of nostalgia and desire: Sara takes Isak Borg by the hand and leads him to a sunlit clearing in the forest. On the other side he can see his parents. They wave to him.
One thread goes through the story in multiple variations: shortcomings, poverty, emptiness, and the absence of grace. I didn't know then, and even today I don't know fully, how through Wild Strawberries I was pleading with my parents: see me, understand me, and—if possible—forgive me."
Ingmar Bergman, Images: My Life in Film (1990) * W. Strawberries (script)

"Film as dream, film as music. No for of art goes beyond ordinary consciousness as film does, straight to pour emotions, deep into the twilight room of the soul. A little twitch in our optic nerve, a shock effect: twenty-four illuminated frames in a second, darkness in between, the optic nerve incapable of registering darkness. At the editing table, when I run the trip of film through, frame by frame, I still feel that dizzy sense of magic of my childhood: in the darkness of the wardrobe, I slowly wind one frame after another, see almost imperceptible changes, wind faster - a movement." (from The Magical Lantern, 1987)

Wild Strawberries *

* Two Tarkovsky pages @ film.vtheatre.net: Mirror & Rublev ("Sacrifice" doc hour) for Russian Cinema + in Russian *

Bergman2005 *

... 2008 ?


Bergman I (Analysis)

Bergman II, filmmaker (FM directory) : directing.vtheatre.net


film cinema,directors,bergman
Film School in Ethiopia : LUL

index * METHOD acting for directors * 200X Aesthetics * Film Dir * Theatre Books * Film Books * Theatre w/Anatoly * SHOWs * Script Analysis * Acting * Directing * Russian-American Theatre (RAT) * Film Links * Film Analysis * Biomechanics * Classes * VIRTUAL THEATRE * Mining Film: books & links * Book of Spectator * My Nonfiction (webtexts): Theology of Technology * POV * PostAmeriKa * Father-Russia * Bookmark vTheatre! Amazon * Mailing List & News -- subscribe yourself theorytheatre theory and Anatoly Blogs - Newsblog: anatoly-film
Bergman - Film with Anatoly



[Bergman Pages]

I do not know when I will have a chance to update this page, although I have reference to Bergman in all my film classes. He is good for dramatic structure analysis, even as a script-writing example! I use Bergman to illustrate "subjective camera" and POV -- "subjective time"... It's impossible to do without de-objectivization of space.

Sometimes I compare Bergman with Felinni, they are similar in being opposite.

Tarkovsky was inspired by Bergman more, than Bergman's had ever expressed in his admiration for Tarkovsky.

Bergman as any real artist is uneven. There is "early Bergman" and "late Bergman"... but this is for the film historians to talk about.

He is a master.

There are many crafted filmmakers, movie-makers, I should say. Bergman makes films, even when he shoots movies.

"Film-Artist" is something of the past. Bergman was both. He advanced film language without being "experimental" -- you can see him narrating in his most formalistic films. HOW was never separated from WHAT. Bergman is simple.

This simplicity is missing in postmodernity.

He was born before it.

I should speak about Bergman in past tense.

Film is merceless, it looks antique after 50 years...

Films and especially movies do age quickly...

Anatoly' 2000

Bergman : eBook * CD * POD
Bergman has too many talents. He write and writes well. He directs for stage. This is not good for a filmmaker. Film directors should be like an artist or a musician, they don't write or dance. Film directing asks for self-limitations.

If a director can express himself in words, he should have enormous self-discipline. I always wanted to stage "Wild Strawberries" -- it has a lot of theatre structure. I won't do it with 8 1/2 (unless it's an experiment like with the staged "Potemkin" in France).

I consider the big film directors to be new philosophers, the postmodern type of discourse... feeling=thinking.

Art always had philosophy in it, but the subject of "War & Peace" is not philosophy. Films, even movies, because of the technology build-in, do have IDEOLOGY in everything.

Film is musically organized, but unlike music, the last structural principle of Aristotle -- the Idea -- is the form! Film is a THOUGHT.

Experiencing thinking, a living reasoning...

It's ONE idea demonstrated in two hours.

They say film is dream-like, but what are my dreams if not THINKING while my brain sleeps? So, it is thinking without thinking! Pre-thinking? Or maybe PRIME THINKING, the only thought process where I do not control it -- and do not lie!

...when I am free from myself...

as if God speaks through me!

Ideology is one-dimensional. Idea-Drive, excluding the rest, because it's full of desire, or WILL as Nietzsche would say. Of course, it's POWERFUL.

Each good film is a state of mind. It has to be static in order to have evolution within. Film is the STOPPED TIME (Faust), only then we can experience time (Deleuze + Bergson, time and memory).

Eisenstein with his dialictics called it "spiral" structure, when we return over and over again. To the same face for example (CU), as if the eternal return (Nietzsche again). How else can we keep time frozen?

After-feeling: "lost time" (as if I didn't live for two hours). There is no time in eternity.

Film is experience (see cultural studies and Baurdaugh). Film doesn't exist outside of being consumed and consuming. It's not about "understanding" -- there is nothing I do not understand because I SEE everything.

In that sense film is anti-intellectual experience as we know it. Post-human, or pre-human.

Film is language I can speak with animals (and we will when we master 3D technology).

It's REAL. Not just a "reflection" of reality as it was with art before, but the reality itself. Resurrected and immortal reality.

Film is nothing but SELF. That is what the resurrected world is about -- it doesn't exist outside of being SELF, i.e. it's subjective reality. There is no division between subjective and objective anymore, SELF is both. My feelings are very OBJECTIVE, pain is extremely real. The so-called "objective" world follows the logic of Kant; it is a thing-in-itself.

Film is only now considered as art form, in the future it will the art-of-living.

Of course, each of his films is about Bergman. It is his self-portrait of inner-world. The filmmaker doesn't have to be on the screen (I do not see myself in my dreams), I am always the center of drama. Everything focused on me and about me. Self-centered, introvert existence.

Read Heidegger again: Being is Becoming and Becoming is Being. There is no Being outside of this process, no existence without being the time itself, without becoming the time.

Heidegger on Nietzsche (Chapter 8): Will as Affect, Passion and Felling. Another type of logic. (from Volume I: The Will to Power as Art).

"Nietzsche" -- the name of the thinker stands as the title for the matter of his thinking -- the first phrase in the Foreword.

Knowledge is supposed to be private and personal. Film in itself is the act of WILL to POWER.

Film is the peak of meditation!

Greeks: psyche is "soul" -- that is the material and method of film.

Heidegger (p. 61): Will to power is never the willing of a particular actual entity. It involves the Being as essence of beings; it is this itself."

My SEEING the world is outside of my will, it is The Will to Power which is I. The power of film in it. The SEEING is this resurrection (becoming=being). Hegel would say the self-realization of the Spirit ("energy of thinking, the pure ego").

That is the subject of film and Bergamn makes it into HIS subject. Not just abstract "being" but his own being equated with the Being.

There is no world without or outside this personal and private Being, no truth without THAT truth. That's is concrete enough to be true.

"I" speak...

We say -- camera...

My personal resurrection can't take place with participation of all (technology). There is not enough technology yet, we are not ready...

We are getting there...

goto : tarkovsky.wetpaint.com wiki


TimePick Animated -- Go for POV: Film-Light Theory
2006 -- directing 101
He was one of a very few who changed my life. There was me before I saw "Wild Strawberries" and Anatoly-after the film. Click on the graphics above and go to the DEEP THEORY pages

Bergman -- See Shots & Images Preview

Ingmar Bergman in 1959. Like Eisenstein he came to film from theatre.

Part One. SHOTS

Bergman Closeup One

Bergman likes the extreme -- black and white, shadow and light, and extreme closeups (XCU). Lighting is very gothic (since I don't have time to collect images and take care of copyright) as if it's always "INT." even when it's "EXT."! I use Bergman's CUs for my class on Shots. Lighting brings him and Tarkovsky together.

Bergman, Closeup #2 -- see CUT Page

Bergman, CU #3 What we see is always in context of what we don't. The art of a shot is in arranging the acting in front of the camera in such a way that we are in dynamic suspense between in-frame action and action framed-out.

[For practical applications of film theory, go to Film Directing 101, I made this page for "Film Analysis" course. Long ago. In a different century and millenium. That's how old I am. AA]

Bergman's CU #4

Especially, when it's out of focus.

Remember: CU is always the climatic indicator.

(Dynamic) Composition Shots (see Montage to study the different between static and dymanic arrangements within a single frame).
2004 & After

projects: Demons: Dostoevsky, Camus & Me -- War of Terror

texts: HIM web-biography

in focus: filmmaking 101



* dfilm.com
* ifilm.com
* mediatrip.com
* super8
* classics
* independent

2009 cine101 LUL

NOTES (from/for Film & Drama Class)

Film & Movies 2007
Bergman and Tarkovsky were chosen because they represent this Northern sensitivity, which I believe is the core of film-nature. Both are non-Catholic, with the strong division between Earth and Heaven. Maybe even with the resentment to living... and admiration for the beauty of everything mortal.
[ ... ]


[On Protestant Mentality. New God was born in the North of Europe. Scandinavia is North of Germany... In North I let Kierkegaard speak, on Bergman's page it's Luther.]
When our Lord and Master Jesus Christ said, "Repent" (Mt 4:17), he willed the entire life of believers to be one of repentance.[1]
The entire life? Only protestant mind could replace the dictatorship of the church with the self-tyranny.

Dante's Devil is in ice. Italian and Catholic....

I'm glad I didn't see ALL Bergaman's films and didn't read many of his plays. I saw a few good ones. I one I didn't like, I never finish. I can't judge Bergman, I can only love his films I saw.

This fear or horror is sufficient in itself, to say nothing of other things, to constitute the penalty of purgatory, since it is very near to the horror of despair.[2]

LUTHER was a serious man:

[ North Idea ]

[16] Hell, purgatory, and heaven seem to differ the same as despair, fear, and assurance of salvation.
I have my notes on Kierkegaard, who is not a film-maker, but he and Berdyaev understood the essence of existentialism -- the tragic basis of it. In classes we call it "drama" -- we stay away from the word "tragedy."
[92] Away, then, with all those prophets who say to the people of Christ, "Peace, peace," and there is no peace! (Jer 6:14)
Doestoevsky and Freud talked about the pleasure of pain. Film gravitates to violence -- we need to experience terror in order to feel at peace.

[93] Blessed be all those prophets who say to the people of Christ, "Cross, cross," and there is no cross!

Very much about the films -- our fears are induced, they are only to remember the dread....

[94] Christians should be exhorted to be diligent in following Christ, their Head, through penalties, death and hell.
Penalties, death and hell -- the themes.
7th Seal (script) for playwrighting.net
[95] And thus be confident of entering into heaven through many tribulations rather than through the false security of peace (Acts 14:22).
and Bergman (shows.vtheatre.net)

Wild Strawberries

Read the script: Four Plays (one the best styles of writing for the screen!)

First episode: Dr. Berg's dream (in class)

NOTES: BERGMAN is 80 in 1998. Eisenstein -- 100. Tarkovsky was born in 1932. ...

There is another reason for his extreme closeups.

"By focusing on the exploration of the self, his ideas meshed easily with Freudian psychoanalytical thinking, and college students studying his films found ways to express their own inner emotions. Bergman's use of huddled spaces, visual metaphors, flashbacks, and rythymic dance created the language of dreams."


Also, read North page and POV (nonfiction). I recommend to read pages on nordern playwrights in Script Analysis (Ibsen, Srindberg, Chekhov).