Spectator-Writer *

TOPICS: + space + virtual + drama + comedy + postmodern + american age + self + POV + death + resurrection + beyond theory + sex + communism + webbing +
2007 : Writer = Structure?



[ advertising space ]
Stage Directing Theory
Directing Theory: pre-text, text and super-text = playscript + spectacle + public
Actor = Texture?
director

Featured Links: Virtual Theatre WRITER

The structure of vTheatre site is similar! Another the side of the same coin.

ReSearch

Theatre w/Anatoly: intro pages
Aesthetics-Class
Classes: Aesthetics

Index * Theatre w/Anatoly * Books * Virtual Theatre * Theatre Theory * METHOD acting * WebTheatre * Directing * Script Analysis * Acting * Biomechancis * Bookmark vTheatre! Mailing List & News -- subscribe yourself * SHOWS *

Writer

Brecht -- DRAMLIT directory
This is too much! No way! I didn't write this play! What are you talking about? I am just a spectator!

Hold on, let me see....

When I write a play, I write to use your mind, your imagination. I "build" you in, as a part of the dramatic mechanism. You are everywhere in (good) play. [Only in bad scripts there is no place for spectator.]

Yes, but I do not read plays, I see shows...

Yes, you do. You "read" the spoken words against what you see (that's how your read the subtext).

But I didn't write those words!

Relax! Nobody wrote them! You can't forget that it is written, this is a bad writing for theatre. Good writer does it as if the lines are born in your head!

If you look at the structure of the story (composition), you might see why I say that you, the spectator, is the writer of the play.

Here is something I didn't write about how somebody writes for you, instead of you...

NB:

[Book]

Anatomy of a Plot
by Bill Johnson

Creating a plot is a preoccupation of many writers. The purpose of this essay will be to break down into its elements a story that was acknowledged to have created a compelling plot, The Hunt For Red October. By showing how the elements of this story, its premise, characters and plot, worked together to create a well-told story, I hope others writers will be helped to perceive the craft of creating a plot for their own stories.

First, as always, when setting up a story, start with your story premise. In the case of The Hunt For Red October, I've reduced its premise to three words: Freedom defeats oppression. This is what this story is about at its heart. Every character acts in a way that is tied into this premise, and their actions make the story's movement toward its fulfillment potent and dramatic. Because every character feels the pull of the story's premise and what its sets out to be at stake in the story, their actions serve to move the story forward.

This story opens by introducing Ramius and his seething hatred of the communists, his oppressors; and his plan to flee Russia in the Red October, a nuclear missile armed Russian submarine under his command. By introducing Ramius and his thoughts and plans as the Red October leaves port, the story itself is introduced in a state of movement. Ramius isn't considering his plans. As this story opens, he's a character "ripe" and ready to act. Just as important, the issue at the heart of the story, the conflict between freedom and oppression, is clearly set out through his inner conflict.

As Ramius and the Red October leave Port, Ramius comes up against the first obstacle to his plans. Even though he is the Captain of the Red October, the other power on the ship is its political officer. To set in motion his plan to flee the grip of his oppressive masters, Ramius must do something about the Red October's political officer...his oppressor in residence.

Even thought we are only pages into this novel, two questions have arisen. Will Ramius be able to make it to America if he attempts to flee? That is the main plot question that this story will answer. This question is an important aspect of creating a plot, and it's why writers sometimes confuse what's at stake in their story with the main question raised by their plot, while the two issues should be considered separately. Considered separately because what's at stake in a story is what gives meaning and purpose to a story's main plot question. Struggling writers, however, often attempt to develop plot or story questions around character issues, goals, or the outcome of plot devices that aren't clearly tied into what's at stake in their stories. Those kinds of questions can fail to generate a compelling hold on a reader's attention, no matter how dramatic such questions might appear when considered in isolation.

The second purpose of a plot is create what I call scene questions that engage a reader's on-going interest. In this story, the first question we're being asked is, how will Ramius get around the ship's political officer? Note that the reader, if they feel drawn into Ramius's character, internalizes this dilemma and wants it resolved.

The dramatic answer to this question about what Ramius must do about the political officer if he wants to move forward with his plans? Ramius kills him.

By his action, he shows his utter determination to be free, whatever the price. And, now there is no turning back. Ramius must go forward, in spite of any obstacles. The scene question has been answered. Will Ramius have the strength of will to put his plan into effect? Yes.

But note this plot issue: Once Ramius acts to move forward, his action resolves one question, but it escalates the story to a higher level of obstacles and conflicts that Ramius-- and we, the readers who have internalized his situation--must resolve.

That's the purpose of the plot, to generate this escalation of the story's dramatic tension to make its movement more potent, and desirable to be experienced, to the story's readers.

The next series of obstacles that Ramius must overcome are the Soviet submarines sent to hunt him when he doesn't report in. His failure to report is first seen as the probable result of an accident due to the sloppy construction methods common in the communist era of the Soviet Union. But when it is realized that Ramius and the Red October under his command are acting on the authority of Ramius alone, his oppressors are forced into a state of movement by Ramius' actions.

Again, note that's the purpose of the plot. By Ramius' actions, he draws forth the obstacles that will block his further action.

Even as Ramius' superiors react, they must grope for an answer to what they fear. Is Ramius a madman commanding a nuclear submarine? A madman whose country they have ruthlessly oppressed? He must be found and stopped!

Note that the conflict over the story's forward movement, and therefore the story's drama, has again escalated.

At this point, an American navy submarine picks up the Red October's trail, and the activity around the search for the Red October. While the Soviet oppressors desire to keep this "problem" hidden and therefore under their control, it is clearly already moving beyond that. It's another escalation of the drama over the story's eventual outcome. It also serves to introduce the American characters who will manifest through their actions that freedom is already in conflict with oppression. Again, it's another story issue that's "ripe" as the story opens, not one that needs to be developed, but simply introduced in relationship to what's already been set into motion in the story.

Characters, then, reveal themselves as they react to the obstacles the plot has placed in their path. A plot operates to create obstacles specifically for that purpose, that as characters must act with greater and greater dramatic determination, their actions draw readers more deeply into a story.

Even though the Americans are simply reacting to events, their clear relationship to the story's premise gives their actions meaning and purpose in terms of what's at stake in the story.

To continue his quest for freedom, Ramius must elude Soviet submarines commanded by men he has trained, who have been ordered to find and bring him back, or destroy him. A whole series of scenes play out to answer the next story question. Will Ramius be able to outsmart and elude the other submarine commanders he trained?

The story's answer to this dramatic question: yes.

Again, it's another step that escalates the drama not only for a series of scenes, but that ties into the overall drama over the story's outcome.

Eluding his fellow submarine commanders only serves to convince Ramius's oppressors that he has evil intentions, however. They go from fearing his motives, to ordering his destruction on sight. Again, resolving one issue doesn't make things easier for Ramius. It only escalates the drama over the story's movement once again. Not just for Ramius, but, just as important, for the story's readers.

During this series of scenes, the news of the strange occurrences of the Soviet fleet reach Washington...and CIA analyst Jack Ryan. At this point in the story, the Americans fear what the Soviets might be up to.

This, again, is the very purpose of the plot, to find ways to array against Ramius not only the Soviet navy, but the American navy as well. Note that this escalation also puts the Americans and Soviet in potential conflict. But that issue, too, grows out of the story's premise about the conflict between freedom and oppression.

The very fact that Ramius continues to overcome obstacles and move toward America, which represents freedom, generates even more fear and alarm in Moscow AND Washington D.C.

Since his motives are unclear, all either side knows is that someone in control of nuclear missiles is acting on their own. It gives the Americans just as much incentive to track and find Ramius as the Soviets.

To ensure the destruction of Ramius, a soviet attack submarine positions itself to move in for the kill before Ramius can break into open waters. In a dramatic confrontation, Ramius outmaneuvers his opponent, and breaks into the Atlantic.

He now seems closer to his goal...but moving into the Atlantic and moving toward America causes severe consternation to the Americans. Should they destroy Ramius, now that they know he's a renegade in control of nuclear missiles? Jack Ryan suspects Ramius's true motives. Because he operates in a free system, Jack can voice his thoughts, and work to convince others based on the merit of his ideas, not his status.

The Soviets, trying to respond to Ramius' actions, are constantly hampered by their system that doesn't allow for intelligent, creative, on the scene reactions. All must wait for orders, or risk the reaction of an oppressive system.

Now the jockeying happens not only between the American Navy, Soviet Navy and Ramius, but between the Soviet and American government. Now the talk is of a potential world war if Ramius acts with hostile intent toward America. See the escalation over the potential outcome of this story? Will the world go to war over one man's desire to be free? Note how far this story has escalated the drama over its outcome, and the fulfillment of its premise?

Again, it is the function of the plot to create this drama over the story's outcome and the question it raises: Can freedom defeat oppression? Will Ramius be able to make it to America?.

Jack Ryan's analysis that Ramius is on a quest for freedom carries the day. But it raises a new question for the Americans. Should they aid Ramius in his quest? Even if they wanted to, how could they? Again, as the story moves forward, scenes raises questions that must be answered. But as each scene question is answered, another rises in its place to make a claim on reader's attention and their state of emotions.

If readers value their freedom, what would it mean to them if Ramius were captured, or killed, by his pursuers?

For the Americans, Ryan has some ideas on how to handle the situation. Again, because he operates in a free system, his ideas are given credence. Note how this ties directly into the story's premise about freedom, in the same way that every character and character action is rooted in the story's premise.

To aid Ramius, Ryan is placed aboard the Red October. A new escalation of the story. Would this be considered an act of war if the American's have misjudged Ramius's intentions? Is this some kind of diabolical trick of the Russians to lead the Americans into such a trap?

On the Red October, Ryan duels with a Soviet assassin determined to kill Ramius. So these scenes again raise questions. Will the assassin get to Ramius? Or kill Ryan?

Ryan kills the assassin, and saves Ramius.

Now we enter the end-game of the story. Every action is fraught with dramatic tension. Readers are literally sitting on the edge of their seats by this point. Will Ramius make it? If the Americans rescue him, will they be compelled to return him to his oppressive masters?

Jack Ryan, working with Ramius now, has an idea. Again, because Jack operates in a free system, he has the initiative to come up with a plan to save both the Red October and Ramius in a way that leaves Ramius free. Others are also free to use their initiative to respond to Jack Ryan's requests for assistance.

Working together, Ramius, Jack Ryan...and the men and women working in freedom to aid them, find a way to dramatically outwit Ramius's oppressors and bring him the last step to freedom.

Potent, dramatic fulfillment of story. Freedom has defeated oppression.

Again, because we've internalized this story through Ramius, this story has a very, very satisfying, and fulfilling, ending.

The storyteller needs to see that the purpose of their plot is to escalate the drama over the outcome of scenes and character goals, and over the outcome of the story itself. To talk about the story's plot is to see that process of escalating the dramatic tension through the outcome of scenes, character goals and issues in a way that ties into the overall dramatic tension over the story's outcome. So the story must never simply move forward, but move forward in a dramatic way that increasingly pulls on the attention and desire of the reader to experience the story's outcome.

This action of a plot can be found in any well told story. The stories of Joyce, Woolf, Austen, Pynchon, Faulkner, James. Action adventure movies. Coming of age stories. Cartoons. All stories that engage the attention and interest of readers touch on one or more of the foundation issues of storytelling I've laid out in these essays.

To perceive what lies at the heart of your story, and how to bring that dramatically to life through your story's plot, is one more tool of the storyteller's art.

Copyright 1995 Bill Johnson

[1]Dramatic Writing Home Page References 1. http://www.teleport.com/~bjscript/index.htm
2007-2008
2004 & After

projects:
Bergman
Kurosawa

texts: Shrew04 + Oedipus X

in focus: StageMatrix

reading: see BOOKS pages in all directories

Links

playsChekhov, Ibsen, Shakespeare


The Theatre Banner Exchange
Google
Search WWW Search filmplus.org Search vtheatre.net

2004 filmplus.org *

Go.dot.06
* home * about * guide * webmasters wanted * classes * advertise * faq * contact * news * forums * mailing list * bookstore * ebooks * search * calendar * games * polls * submit your link * web *
@2002-2003 2004 filmplus.org * spectator *
 


  


Get Site Info * Next: