Lul-Film : CLUB [ film, film-north, film with Anatoly ]

Film-North * 2009 : cine101 * 2008 * kickapps.com/film-north

TOPICS: drama + comedy + postmodern + time + space + death + self + imdb + history + scripts + amazon.com/kindle

This page (and many others) belong to film.vtheatre.net directory! Film Analysis....

2007 updates!

Recommended (see Director's Pages):

Bergman
Tarkovsky
Fellini
Kurosawa

Movies

Film Directing Class

Film Studies UAF

Way back when I made those pages I thought that I will have time to write my notes... Well, I do not have time to write -- and even to see films. I have no time for Film Club and for Film Festival...

I have no time... to think.

Go to Directors Forum, subscribe yourself and post your own thoughts about films and directing.

* Must submit 200-words post after each film!

Go back to film.vtheatre.net!

2004 *

Summary

Wild Strawberries *

Questions

Tarkovsky -- Aesthetics

Notes

2003: Citizen Kane in class.

* Two Tarkovsky pages @ film.vtheatre.net: Mirror & Rublev ("Sacrifice" doc hour) for Russian Cinema *

* 2006 * new (film analysis) pages: eisen & eisenstein, silent, soviet cinema, kurosawa, tarkovsky ....


index * METHOD acting for directors * 200X Aesthetics * Film Dir * Theatre Books * Film Books * Theatre w/Anatoly * SHOWs * Script Analysis * Acting * Directing * Russian-American Theatre (RAT) * Film Links * Film Analysis * Biomechanics * Classes * VIRTUAL THEATRE * Mining Film: books & links * Book of Spectator * My Nonfiction (webtexts): Theology of Technology * POV * PostAmeriKa * Father-Russia * Bookmark vTheatre! Amazon * Mailing List & News -- subscribe yourself theorytheatre theory and Anatoly Blogs - Newsblog: anatoly-film

FILMS & MOVIES

2007 -- film.vtheatre.net/2007
Folks, I started this page long ago for the UAF Film Club (I don't have time for them now) -- so, instead of making a new page, I will write a few words on my selections of films (videos and DVD).

I list only the titles I show in my classes (or would like to show), mostly the classics. I would like to have a vew separate lists to explain (show) the reasons, why I include this or that film. Mainly, because the goals of each course is different. In the 200X Aesthetics: Theatre, Art, Music Through Film -- an introduction to the language of cinema. In Film Directing is the practical applications of film theory. In Film & Drama -- the aim is to study the film narrative. In Film of the North -- the specifics (or even metaphysics) of the northern film schools. And so on...

Keep it in mind, when you go through the listings (same with the books), or better check the classes directory).

[See Listings at the bottom of the page]

From somewhere in the past:
Yes, my friend, there are films and there are movies in this world. I post here the notes I take for films I show in my classes and for the Film Club discussions.

I still struggle with the idea of including American film-makers into the Films of the North. In my directing class I have them -- Lynch, Tarantino, Cameron, Coppola.

Tarantino - Film with Anatoly

Film Club Screenings

Kyle Erck: As part of their ongoing ambition to create a more cinema-literate environment in Fairbanks, The UAF Film club is presenting the Lars Van Triers film ,”Zentropa,” on Nov. 14 in the Salisbury Theatre at 7:00 p.m.

“Zentropa” is a German film that won the jury prize at the Cannes Film Festival in 1996. It became known for the stylistic way in which it shows the story of a young American man looking for a job in Germany, 1945. According to Sean Bledsoe, the Film Club Vice President, the film is a must see.

“It really pushes convention, he said, “The whole movie is a hypnosis session and the audience are the ones being hypnotized. We’re trying to get people to read films instead of just simply watching them. Films like ‘Zentropa’ help.”

The Film Club has been known for choosing films that try to make artistic statements and entertain at the same time. With a list of movies that include David Lynch’s “Lost Highway,” Martin Scorcese’s, “The Last Temptation of Christ,” and Jean-Pierre Jeunot’s, “City of Lost Children,” the reputation comes well deserved says Tracy Campbell, the Film Club’s official Scribe.

“The movies we show are all the same in the fact that they all have a main question and try to explore possible answers, but urposefully leave you asking more questions. They become conversations instead of lectures. Too many mainstream films today just preach at you.”

The Film Club came into existence in the fall of 1997 with its screening of “Lost Highway,” and began moving its efforts more towards film-making with the “Black Days White Nights Film Festival” held annually on Valentine’s Day weekend. The festival includes screenings as well as film-making workshops and is held in the Great Hall Salisbury Theatre. This year’s festival theme is “Russian - America, American - Russia” contrasting the difference between the two country’s films about one another.

Not all the movies shown by the Film Club are of a serious nature however says Bledsoe.

“Last year for the festival we showed ‘Barbarella,’ and ‘Friday the Thirteenth’ just for fun,” he said, “There are a lot of fun films out there that are worth watching just for they way they tell the story.”

Film club members enjoy free screenings and popcorn (when available), and partake in discussions following each film. Meetings are held every Sunday at noon in theatre room 101 at UAF. The schedule for screenings after “Zentropa,” include Hal Hartly’s “Trust” on Nov. 28, and Francis Ford Coppola’s “The Conversation” on Dec. 12. The film schedule for next semester has yet to be set.

To learn more about the Film Club or to get on their e-mail list check the Film Club website at http://members.tripod.com/~afronord/club.html

[They, the film students, graduated already]

SIDE BOX:

Highlights of Film Club Screenings:

-Burnt by the Sun
-Lost Highway
-Dead Man
-Natural Born Killers
-Lolita
-The Shining
-Barbarella
-Friday the 13th
-Casablanca
-Man Bites Dog
-The Last Temptation of Christ
-Easy Rider
-City of Lost Children
-Blue Velvet

*Nov. 14 - Zentropa -Nov. 28 - Trust -Dec. 12- The Conversation


My notes on one of Film Club Screening:
(Sorry, Film Club, the rest of this page is for Film & Drama class films!

My Notes (Anatoly):

DEAD MAN

Jim Jarmusch, director

Blake passages, "Some are born to sweet delight; some are born to endless night." Are there symbols of Blake? Milton?

When Blake is surprised that Nobody knows, they are being followed, Nobody explains, "The evil stench of white man precedes him."

White is not a color or skin, but the taste of thought.

Culture of Violence: violence as language (media). America is a real birth place of film.

[Violence as comedy. Spaghetti westerns were always comical in their stupidity.]

PM: Western as Reality. The spectators know the simulacra, not life; so the art reflects of their "life" -- which is fiction. They are ideological creatures. Never killed anyone, or even shot at a man, never rode on the horseback, never were shot at. They fantasized about living, about being male, about being a hero. Western is a sublimation prescribed by Dr. Freud. "Dead Man" is a reflection of this American ideology.

Dreams easily turn into lies. American Dream. Cowboy -- a folk hero. What were his qualities for a hero? Simplicity or stupidity. Where is he now? Gone. What is left is a cult of physical power. Who is the target? Another man. not nature anymore, it's domesticated.

An accountant turned into a serial killer. If Cleveland wasn't dead enough. Dead = money. "Stupid White Man" -- they don't live. They are dead before they die.

They point their gun at men, because they are impotent. There are no women in Westerns. Woman is a whore, good for sex only. But they could sex with each other. The World Wrestling Federation -- the fakers. Bodybuilders are in love with their bodies, spending more time pumping up than a woman on her makeup.

No birth, only KILLING. The only action and activity they know and capable. America: Men Without Women. Coexistence.

Of course, they eat each other. Screwed up Animals. Cannibalism of a bounty hunter.

"The Machine" city -- without Soul. Inferno isn't a metaphor, we made it in a reality. We build the Hell, calling it Civilization. No pity? Easy. No feelings. Period. Only fear (Aristotle) -- that's a prescription for hell. Love in paradise is killing, a mercy (Indian). Return to the world of spirits. Being Dead is blessing in the kingdom of Death.

There's no time in hell. No reason, no logic. Composition: use of fade-to-black to represents the passage of time. These fades were frequently and consistently used, and they produced a unifying effect (reference to b&w films). During the occasional recollection scenes, Jim Jarmusch negates the fade, going to white to indicate a memory....

Dead deer. Looks like DYING deer.

Who are they, American Indians? They are not smarter or deeper, they are still mortals, living and that's their purpose for existence. Nobody (Gary Farmer): What is yours?

Eight Eyes of God (including Milton, the awakened Humanity, the only idea of the Supreme Being that will remain after the Last Judgment), according to Blake.

Image of the invisible God (Christ) -- cinema, visions.

The painter maintains in his work a natural distance from reality, the cameraman penetrates deeply into its web. There is a tremendous difference between the pictures they obtain. That of the painter is a total one, that of the cameraman consists of multiple fragments which are assembled under a new law. Thus, for contemporary man the representation of reality by the film is incomparably more significant than that of the painter, since it offers, precisely because of the thoroughgoing permeation of reality with mechanical equipment, an aspect of reality which is free of all equipment. And that is what one is entitled to ask from a work of art. (Walter Benjamin, Illuminations, The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, p. 230)

Film is the language of the American Age, the time after the end of the world. (Blake and the nature of cinema).

Evidently a different nature opens itself to the camera than to the naked eye if only because an unconsciously penetrated space is substituted for a space consciously explored by man. Even if one has a general knowledge of the way people walk one knows nothing of a person's posture during the fractional second of a stride. The act of reaching for alight or a spoon is familiar routine, yet we hardly know what has really gone on between hand and metal, not to mention how this fluctuates with our moods. Here the camera intervenes with the resources of its of its lowering and liftings, its interruptions and isolations, its extensions and accelerations, its enlargements and reductions. The camera introduces us to unconscious optics as does psychoanalysis to unconscious impulses. (236-237)

Does Nobody tell the story? Sees it even before he enters the plot? Train. His POV (style of the film)?

...tracking shots -- moving (spirit), journey?

Film & Drama, Spring & Summer 99

LA Italian Film Fest Go for Links to Fellini Sites!

Go to film.vtheatre.net!

Bergman: Wild Strawberries

Tarantino: Pulp Fiction

Distopia: Terminator II

[not posted yet]

...
I don't have time to post my notes on films/movies I saw (I don't even have time to write down my thoughts on many; like the most recent "Jackie Brown"). Tarantino has a (primitive) director's talent; I follow his work. He is a good writer. Something like "American Godard." He swims in commercial waters and lives, but I don't know for how long he can do it. There are "masters" like Speilberg, who can do it.
Yes, I put "masters" in quotation brackets because of my respect for the masters.
... Links:
More on Reference Page

My Mailing List: subscribe and stay updated!

Links out:

Films Ratings

The Movie Mecca
- Various Movie Survey Topics

MovieEye (Posters and etc.)

Visit Humberto WebSite
for film listings Films

Actors

Paramount Pictures

20th Century Fox

New Line Cinema

Hollywood Pictures

MGM/United Artists

Universal Studios

Warner Bros.

Next: movies
@2000-2003 film-north * Scorsese - Film with Anatoly
* film-north = filmplus.org : home * about * guide * family * classes * advertise * sponsors * faq * contact * news * forums * mailing list * bookstore * ebooks * search * calendar * games * polls * submit your link * web * shop * All scripts and texts on this site are intended for educational purposes only *
February 25, 2004
      OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR 
     
      Do You Recognize This Jesus?

      By KENNETH L. WOODWARD

      Watching "The Passion of the Christ," Mel Gibson's new movie, I kept 
      thinking the following: it is Christians, not Jews, who should be shocked 
      by this film.

      Mr. Gibson's raw images invade our religious comfort zone, which has long 
      since been cleansed of the Gospels' harsher edges. Most Americans worship 
      in churches where the bloodied body of Jesus is absent from sanctuary 
      crosses or else styled in ways so abstract that there is no hint of 
      suffering. In sermons, too, the emphasis all too often is on the smoothly 
      therapeutic: what Jesus can do for me. 

      More than 60 years ago, H. Richard Neibuhr summarized the creed of an 
      easygoing American Christianity that has in our time triumphantly come to 
      pass: "A God without wrath brought men without sin into a kingdom without 
      judgment though the ministrations of a Christ without a cross." Despite 
      its muscular excess, Mr. Gibson's symbol-laden film is a welcome 
      repudiation of all that.

      "The Passion of the Christ" is violent - no question. Although Mel Gibson 
      the believer identifies with a traditionalist movement that rejects 
      Vatican Council II, Mel Gibson the artist here displays a thoroughly 
      Catholic sensibility, one that since the Middle Ages has emphasized Jesus 
      as the suffering savior crowned with thorns. Martin Luther, too, would 
      have recognized in this film his own theology of the cross.
      But there is a little twist here. In his prerelease screenings, Mr. Gibson 
      invited mostly conservative evangelical clergy. They in turn responded by 
      reserving huge blocks of movie tickets for their congregations. When the 
      film opens today, expect theaters around the country to be turned into 
      temporary churches.

      And what's so strange about this? Unlike Mr. Gibson's film, evangelical 
      Protestantism is inherently non-visual. As spiritual descendants of the 
      left wing of the Reformation, evangelicals are heirs to an iconoclastic 
      tradition that produced the "stripping of the altars," as the historian 
      Eamon Duffy nicely put it. That began in the late 16th century, when 
      radical Protestants removed Christ's body from the cross. To the Puritans, 
      displays of the body of Jesus represented what they considered the idol 
      worship of the Papists. To this day, evangelical sanctuaries can be 
      identified by their lack of visual stimulation; it is rare to see statues 
      or stained-glass windows with human figures. For evangelicals, the symbols 
      are all in sermon and song: verbal icons. It's a different sensibility. 
      For this reason, I think, evangelical audiences will be shocked by what 
      they see. And, as Mr. Gibson has said repeatedly, he means to shock. 
      Catholics will find themselves on familiar ground: they, at least, have 
      retained the ritual of praying "the stations of the cross" - a Lenten 
      practice that, like Mr. Gibson's movie, focuses on the last 12 hours in 
      the life of Jesus. By contrast, Southern Baptists and other mostly 
      fundamentalist churches do not observe Lent, and even Catholics have muted 
      the ancient tradition of fast and abstinence that commemorated the Passion 
      of Jesus.

      Indeed, Mr. Gibson's film leaves out most of the elements of the Jesus 
      story that contemporary Christianity now emphasizes. His Jesus does not 
      demand a "born again" experience, as most evangelists do, in order to gain 
      salvation. He does not heal the sick or exorcise demons, as Pentecostals 
      emphasize. He doesn't promote social causes, as liberal denominations do. 
      He certainly doesn't crusade against gender discrimination, as some 
      feminists believe he did, nor does he teach that we all possess an inner 
      divinity, as today's nouveau Gnostics believe. One cannot imagine this 
      Jesus joining a New Age sunrise Easter service overlooking the Pacific. 
       Like Jeremiah, Jesus is a Jewish prophet rejected by the leaders of his 
      own people, and abandoned by his handpicked disciples. Besides taking an 
      awful beating, he is cruelly tempted to despair by a Satan whom millions 
      of church-going Christians no longer believe in, and dies in obedience to 
      a heavenly Father who, by today's standards, would stand convicted of 
      child abuse. In short, this Jesus carries a cross that not many Christians 
      are ready to share. 

      It is easy, of course, to contrast third-millennium Christian mores with 
      the story of Christ's Passion. Like other Americans, Christians want 
      desperately to know that they are loved, in the words of the old 
      Protestant hymn, "just as I am." But the love of God, as Dorothy Day liked 
      to put it, "is a harsh and dangerous love" that requires real 
      transformation. It is not the sort imagined by today's spiritual seekers 
      who are "into" Asian religions. 

      Significantly, the Passion and death of Jesus is the chief element in the 
      Gospel story that other religions cannot accept. In Islam, Jesus does not 
      die on the cross because such a fate is considered unfitting for a prophet 
      of Allah. By Hindus and Buddhists, Jesus is often regarded as a spiritual 
      master, but the story of his suffering and death are considered unbecoming 
      of an enlightened sage. Like the Buddha, the truly liberated transcend 
      suffering and death. But Jesus submits to it - willingly, Christians 
      believe - for the sins of all.

      Were we a nation of Bible readers, not just Bible owners, I don't think a 
      film like Mr. Gibson's would cause much fuss. While I do not think that 
      "The Passion of the Christ" is anti-Semitic, I do think it presents 
      Christians with a "teaching moment." But the lessons have more to do with 
      forgotten Christian basics than with who killed Jesus.
      Kenneth L. Woodward, a contributing editor at Newsweek, is the author, 
      most recently, of "The Book of Miracles."

      Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company 
Fellini

rate 2005-2006 Theatre UAF Season: Four Farces + One Funeral & Godot'06
film-north blog Copyright © 2007 by filmplus.org. Permission to link to this site is granted.
my books.google.com + scholar.google.com * eCitations *
www.everything2.com search!

FILM amazon

film-north home: new * intro * appendix * links * references * books * biblio * guide * list * faq * notes * map * help * bookmarks.bks + my bookmarks (film) * bloglines.com/public/anatolant * archive * teatr.us * chekhov.us * filmstudy clips * directing videos * flickr: film-art * domains * virtual theatre domains * clips * store * project 2009 * calendar * My BLOGS * my.yahoo.com & igoogle.com

Live Writing Advice diigo it